Forensics of the Malala False Flag Operation

And they planned, and Allah planned; And Allah is the Best of Planners! (Holy Quran 8: 30)


Some mysteries are never solved for the public, especially the intriguing thrillers presented in Pakistani politics! Whether it is the Osama Bin Laden fiasco or the Memo-Gate scandal or the latest ‘Malala myth’, the Pakistanis and the rest of the world are left guessing as to what really happened. They are only left to work it out using the ‘Cui Bono’ formula-meaning ‘who benefits’.

Forensic Medicine is a branch of medicine that involves the study and application of medical knowledge in the legal field. Because modern medicine is a legal creation and medico-legal cases involving death, rape, paternity etc. require a medical practitioner to produce evidence and appear as an expert witness, these two fields have traditionally been inter-dependent. We shall use forensic expertise to solve this mysterious case of ‘attempt to murder’.

Prelude to the Malala ‘Drama’

 Emotions were running high and public opinion was changing rapidly against the American drone strikes in Pakistan after the Anti-Islamic film against the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and the successful Peach March against drones by PTI under the leadership of Imran Khan. America had to do something to stop this and do it fast!

Pakistan Telecommunications Authority (PTA) had blocked YouTube plus a thousand other websites that may leak sensitive information about the events to occur ahead.

The Pakistani patriots are sick of American drones blowing up their children while a study just came out exposing the fact that for every assumed “terrorists’ they kill, drones kill 40 or so innocent people. The attention of the world to the cruelties and barbaric bombardment of innocent civilians in FATA as revealed by the participation of 32 Americans and several British in the PTI march, its coverage by the BBC and the denunciation of drone attacks by the visiting Russian foreign minister, editorials against drone attacks in the Financial Times and other newspapers reveal the global attention that US crimes against the people of Pakistan were getting

The fake liberal fascists of the Pakistani media were also getting battered and bruised on social media by true patriots and were looking towards their masters for an answer!

The timing of the attack on Malala Yousafzai on October 9 just one day after the PTI march against drone attacks is most intriguing and thus, little innocent Malala’s attack could not have come at a better time for the American government and the fake liberals!

Background of Malala, her Father and the CIA


Malala was a SHY 11 year old girl, who is somehow suddenly transoformed into a publically fearless teenager who becomes an educational activist!

Malala’s father a businessman, who is a school owner and whose business had gone down after the trouble in Swat, was looking for more opportunities. Whether it was the father or her daughter or both who seemed extremely enthusiastic to restore female education (which is a very good thing) can be guessed.

The school OWNER’s business is about to be shut down and out of the blue his “obedient” daughter takes up his “personal crusade” to bring more for-profit schools to Pakistan (and thus increase his wealth). There must be a third hand involved and that is where the meeting of Malala & her family with US envoy late Richard Halbrooke in 2010 comes in!

Many suggest that Malala herself was there to meet and come up with a plan to help the Americans out. A journalist covering her story, Mr Adam, said to be a CIA agent, says she was there to plead with Holbrooke to help oust the Taliban from the district so her school could reopen. There may be a different theory. It wasn’t Malala meeting with Holbrooke, but her dedicated businessman father.

Now remember, in 2009, this little girl was just one of many who had a blog about what was happening in her country. But it’s hard to say if the blog was even hers since it was posted under a different name and the only real evidence of it resides at the globalist BBC blog page. But somehow little 11 year old Malala was catapulted to international attention by a documentary film, made by the CIA reporter Adam! The family, in collaberation with the CIA (in exchange for some good), made a documentary about the plight of schools and education in the terror-struck area of SWAT.

According to Adam, he started filming little Malala the day before her school was to be shut down by the Taliban (American Taliban) after meeting with the father and Malala 10 days prior to the shut down. What a coincidence. Seems like they had everything in place.

And so Malala would become the face of the for-profit global school system CIA wants to impose in many underdeveloped countries for its own political interests! Now, is that bravery or simple business? Doesn’t this tells us about the true nature of this whole drama?

Questioning of the Timing & the Perpretators of the Attack

Just two days after a protest against U.S. drone strikes killing innocent civilians in Pakistan, along comes the fake Taliban to claim credit for shooting little innocent Malala in cold blood. The fake Taliban spokesman in Pakistan, Ehsanullah Ehsan, took credit for the attack on the schoolgirl by a “phone call” claiming they did it because she liked Barack Obama and because she supported “Western Ideas”.

This by the way is the same fake Taliban spokesman who told the drone protesters to basically “f*ck off” after the protest was turned back. This is the same Ehsanullah Ehsan who took credit for a double bombing in 2011 claiming it was in response to the killing of bin Laden. That confession was also by phone from an “undisclosed location

And with them the whole fake liberal brigade, who had been severely wounded by the protests against anti-Islam film and the drones, and were looking for some opportunity for a strike back, came out with their weapons blazing!

Discrepancies in the Malala Hoax

Remember the different stories that were being related on the Mainstream Media (MSM) concerning the events of 9/11? For example, the live report on BBC of building 7 falling before it actually fell. This is one way in which God plans; He knows humans make mistakes, they are never perfect; that lies never have any feet. Soon after the stories became coming out on about the Malala drama, disprecancies were noted in the stories that were being related.

First there was report of a single bullet injury. A single bullet went from her forehead into her skull, then somehow manged to end up in her shoulder near her neck. They had to change the story of her being shot in the head AND the neck because even as they kept putting out pics of her with her neck covered up someone screwed up and published the photo which clearly shows she wasn’t shot in the neck.

There was also a two bullet report: “Malala was shot twiceonce in the head and once in the neck but HER WOUNDS WERE NOT LIFE-THREATENING”, according to Tariq Mohammad, a doctor at the main hospital in Mingora. But pictures show no wound on her neck. 

Then pictures came out in the electronic media of a certain man and a smaller girl walking towards the helicopter that was ready to take Malala to a hospital in Peshawar. They do have a canny resemblance to Malala and her father. The question is: if they are not THEM according to liberals, then WHO ARE THEY? Could any TOM, DICK and HARRY get into that helicopter or even get the courage to do and WHY do so?

Then there is a picture of Malala with bandage on the RIGHT side of her forehead and another picture of Malala with a bandage on her LEFT. There is one picture of her on the stretcher with RED clothes and another with a BLUE dress. Now WE HAVE PICTURES OF HER RECOVERING IN A HOSPITAL IN UK WITH NO SCAR ON HER FOREHEAD OR ANY OTHER SIGN TO SHOW THAT SHE HAD BEEN SHOT IN THE FOREHEAD. SO NOT SHOT IN THE NECK, NOR IN THE FOREHEAD, WHERE WAS SHE SHOT?

Also, banners and posters printed in English, were ready in such a short time, within 24 hours in protest against the Malala attack and were displayed in protest demonstrations the next day. Were they prepared beforehand?

This should have been the actual picture according to her alleged bullet injury to her face/head:

The Medical Miracle

This is the report by the operating surgeon in Pakistan: “The surgeon who operated on her said a high-velocity bullet, shot from close-range, damaged critical areas of her brain. It is not just Malala’s survival which is in question, but what kind of survival.” This report contradicts the report of the doctor mentioned above at the hospital at Mingora hospital.  It’s a miracle that the gunmen didn’t kill these girls, considering they were at close range.”

Is the main stream media trying to tell me that ‘the bullet that went into her skull from the front temple above her left eye, traveled through her head, down through her neck and lodged itself in her shoulder, that bullet, fired by an evil Taliban member, did absolutely no damage to her brain as it bounced around inside her head til it slipped down her neck and into her shoulder’!?

Then suddenly Malala undergoes miraculous surgery with no brain damage: “The medical tests done on Malala Yousafzai after a bullet was successfully removed from the gunshot victim have revealed that her brain had not sustained any damage”

Now the story from UK doctors is that the bullet grazed off her young skull at the left temple or just above it and it moved down her cheek area damaging her jawbone (or the connection of the jaw) then down the neck somehow passing the carotid artery without nicking it.

What Dr. Rosser at UK wants us to believe is that no other medical facility noticed the fact that she was having trouble breathing due to the fact that her airway was swollen by the passage of the bullet during that entire time. A swelling caused by a bullet wound is VERY MUCH OBVIOUS EVEN TO A LAYMAN. That is highly unlikely.

Furthermore, there is a photo of Malala that was taken while she was at one of the two military facilities, it clearly shows she has not had a tracheostomy at that point and there is no apparent swelling of either her face or her neck.

Malala has also now been given a tracheostomy because as Dr. Rosser says, “her airway was swollen by the passage of the bullet”. This does not conform to what we know about her previous treatments.

It is unlikely as well that a bullet passing her airways would cause swelling some 5-6 days after the contact, though certainly hospital malpractice could explain it, but aside from that, I don’t know what would delay a body’s reaction to a bullet in this way. But clearly, the swelling was not present when this photo was taken of Malala in the hospital some days after the event. No swelling and no tracheotomy.

One can clearly see from pictures below that the Nasogastric tube is not even in her nostril. Its all a drama!

More closer picture

Dr. Rosser then goes on to explain the path of the bullet which he claims entered her skin at the left temple and traveled under the skin but apparently above or outside the skull, down past the front of her ear to the jaw connection where it may or may not have damaged the bone, and then down her neck and ending up in her back near her spine.

I’m not exactly sure how the bullet is supposed to damage her airway and then end up in her back, but somehow the bullet is supposed to have done that. Perhaps he is suggesting it changed direction after making contact with her jaw but if that is the case, how did it cause swelling in her airway?

Another good question becomes how did the bullet not damage her carotid artery?

In looking at the pictures of Malala after the shooting, it seems highly unlikely to me that a bullet passed through her skin under her temple and down the side of her face through her jawline area, to say nothing of her throat. Gunshot wounds to the face leave very serious swelling behind and the photos of her after the attack show absolutely nothing with regard to a possible bullet path moving along the side of her face under the skin. Just go look at that first photo of her.

She is ‘now opening eyes and uttering words’ and ‘will fully recover’ to tell the world her story and what should be done about it.


There is enough forensic medicine evidence to prove that Malala was not shot. Many pictures were photoshopped and the film made of her injury was just an action thriller!

Such false flag operations for political purposes using ‘innocent children’ have been done before. Just google Jessica Lynch of USA and Aesha of Afghanistan, other children that were chosen for playing the dirty games. IF CHILDREN CAN BE BRAINWASHED INTO DOING THIS, THEN THEY CAN ALSO BE BRAINWASHED INTO SUICIDE BOMBING!

I have discussed this under the motives of this false-flag operation in this column:

‘Objectives behind Project Malala’

 For me the case of Malala has been solved and is now closed
Note: Any facial changes/distortions afterwards may have been produced deliberately by surgeons unless explained medically on how the injuries and required changes occurred. From her latest pics circulating on social & other media, it seems her facial nerve has been damaged which was not obvious in previous pictures!

For pictures please see my facebook album

21 thoughts on “Forensics of the Malala False Flag Operation

  1. in my opinion, she was shot. but yes, it was all staged and planned for the right moment. its high time that we talk to the american pigs at Washington in their own language.

  2. It was amazing for me when i read your analysis since i had analyzed it in exactly the same way although i’m not a doctor. But it all seemed fake to me considering all that you have mentioned. good job!!! i wonder why media persons do not consider and highlight these facts and try to pose her as symbol of oppression.

  3. You must share this article with all resourceful / influential people that raise doubts on the whole thing. It is important

  4. Reblogged this on Spat Out Vicious and commented:
    Dr. Nauman Shad had done a wonderful job expressing the doubts of people of Pakistan on the Malala incident. Extremely clinical and professional I’d say …

  5. This has made me start thinking. Everything is contradictory. I heard that they shot her once, then checked somewhere else and they said she was shot thrice! Very confusing. I still don’t want to believe this though. How many times has this happened? How blind have I been?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *