But they plan, and Allah plans. And Allah is the best of planners. (Holy Quran 8: 30) Almost everyone knows by now that 9/11 was an inside job, but much less people know that the 7/7 London bombings were also an inside job. What we mean by an inside job is that it is a false flag operation.

False Flag Operations-2 (Revised)

A false flag operation is a covert operation “an operation that is so planned and executed as to conceal the identity of or permit plausible denial by the perpetrator.” They are designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. Fortunately the people carrying out these false flag operations always leave a lot of clues behind which lead us to the actual perpetrators of the crime. The 7/7 London Bombings were no different. The following points are a summary of this cover-up which is eerily very similar to the 9/11 inside job in many ways. And its no surprising when 7/7 is dubbed as Britain’s 9/11.


The London Times reported that MI5 and MI6 had specifically warned Tony Blair before the July 7 suicide bombings that Al-Qaeda was planning a “high priority” attack specifically aimed at the London underground system. According to & other sources, Scotland Yard had received intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred. The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in:

Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit. Both Scotland Yard and the Israelis have since denied that they had any foreknowledge of the attack. If specific warnings were given why did the MI5 also DOWNGRADE the terror alert level for the first time in four years? If Netanyahu was warned, why were the common citizens not warned?


July 4th, Britain made the announcement that they would be pulling their troops out of Iraq over the next 18 months, but after the attacks, they have a reason to stay in Iraq, how convenient for Tony Blair and George W. Bush. London Bombings 7/7/2005 another false flag terror attack by the British government in order to keep Britain in an illegal war and heighten the state of terror fear on people worldwide.

Preplanned Profits

Who shorted British pound? Currency fell 6% in 10 days before London terror attacks. Why? Because it appears some profited by short selling the British pound in the 10 days leading up to the attacks. “Currencies of establish countries simply do not fall that fast based upon any kind of economic or financial analysis,” said the economist. “Somebody – somewhere – knew something. Or maybe I should say ‘somebodies.'” Two days before the London subway bombings, Fed-Master Alan Greenspan flushed nearly $40 billion in liquidity into financial markets.

Underground Bombing Exercises At Same time

Chillingly coincidental, the same 9/11 “war games” conducted during the actual tragedy on the morning of September 11, 2001, echo London underground “bombing exercises” which took place at the same time as the real attack. Just like the CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning, a company was running drills or exercises that mirrored the exact locations and times of the bombings

“Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.” The chances of this occurring are extremely phenomenal, beyond one in a trillion.

The Bombers: Patsies or Actors?

Extremely Nice People:

The bombers have been described as four “nice lads”, “normal kids who played basketball and kicked a ball around”, one was the son of a fish n chip shop owner, and one was a primary teacher. The immediate family of one of the bombers, the 22 year old sports science graduate, has been quoted as saying they “could not comprehend why he had become a mass murderer.” Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies and guys who taught disabled schoolchildren would want to blow themselves up and kill other innocent people?

Were they framed?

Mohammad Sidique Khan, the teacher who killed himself and six others in the Edgware Road bombing, attended Parliament as the guest of a Labour MP. He was invited in July 2004 by Jon Trickett MP in his capacity as a learning mentor at Hillside Primary School in Beeston, Leeds where Mr Tickett’s wife Sarah is head teacher. [Telegraph]

Is it standard protocol for terrorist suspects to be allowed into the Houses of Parliament? It’s beyond doubt that these four Muslims were framed. They were most likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan and then brought back and told they were to take part in an important exercise to test national security. Give them the rucksacks, get them on the trains and then detonate the bombs remotely.

Did they look or behave like Suicide Bombers?

Following are major reasons why these four guys did not look or behave like suicide bombers:

  1. Filmed by the closed-circuit cameras at the station, the four men looked, the police said, like “happy hikers”, laughing and joking and carrying heavy bags. –London Independent | July 17 2005

The bombers bought round-trip train tickets and paid for long-term parking — According to experts who have been briefed by police, they parked a rental car outside the train station and paid to park for seven days, then purchased round-trip tickets to London.

  1. Why buy return tickets and why pay for long-term parking when one is going to commit suicide?
  2. Moreover, the men were carrying their explosives inside rucksacks, as opposed to strapped to their bodies, as is common practice among suicide bombers.
  3. None were reported to have cried “Allah-o-Akbar” before setting off their charge — something which most suicide bombers do.
  4. Bombs were left in the car. If you were going to use four bombs in four locations, blowing yourself up in the process, why would you leave extra bombs in your hire car for the police to find? Also one of the bombers had spent a lot recently repairing his car.
  5. No suicide notes or videotaped messages for their families have surfaced as has happened in attacks elsewhere.

The bombers were tricked by a “master” who told them they would have time to escape — when, in fact, the devices were set to go off immediately. “The bombers’ master might have thought that he couldn’t risk the four men being caught and spilling everything to British interrogators”.

Train Missed

The London Police claim the bombers were photographed at the Luton station, then rode the 7:40 train to King’s Cross, where they were photographed again. It was originally announced that the alleged perpetrators had taken the 07: 40 Thameslink train from Luton to Kings Cross on the morning of July 7th.

An eyewitness later stated that she had been at Luton station that morning and that the 0740 had been cancelled. The accused were shown on a single CCTV image taken from outside Luton station, apparently entering the station six seconds before 7.22am Even had it not been cancelled, it would not have arrived in time for the men to be photographed at King’s Cross at 8:26 ON 7/7 IT WAS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE ‘SUPPOSED’ LONDON BOMBERS TO BE FILMED AT 7.22 AM AT LUTON STATION AND ALSO CATCH A TRAIN WHICH ARRIVED AT KINGS CROSS PRIOR TO BEING FILMED AT 8.26 AM  It was therefore impossible for any of the four accused Muslims to have caught the tube trains that blew up.

The Fake CCTV Image

To date, no CCTV images of the four alleged suicide bombers have ever been released showing all four of the accused in London on July 7th 2005. The reason given is that the CCTV cameras were not working, which was a common ‘convenient’ phenomenon at all important places that day. In fact, only one CCTV image has ever been released which purports to show all four of the accused together outside Luton Station, approximately 30 miles from the scenes of the crimes, in which three faces are completely unidentifiable.

Points of debate or note about the above photos include:

  • No faces can be identified on three of the individuals.
  • No-one else is present, even though it is rush hour, however, other images subsequently released do show other travelers.
  • It has been claimed that Hasib Hussain sports a prominent beard in the Luton image which is not present in the other images of him released from that day: the ‘more prominent beard’ is possibly explained by lighting conditions – with the light behind him and relative darkness in front and below him, the overall effect is to shade his jaw region.
  • A supposed halo effect around two of the figures: quite probably due to moisture in the air, inside of the camera unit, inside the lens, or on the unit’s glass window.
  • A railing bar has been claimed to appear to go through one of the men: this is most likely due to compression artefacts or an optical illusion due to a confluence of apparently aligned features between foreground and background.
  • The reflection of Hussain’s legs in the window behind has been described as indicating them in the same (not reversed by being reflected) position as they are in the foreground – that it is not a true reflection: with so much image ‘noise’ it is extremely difficult to be certain of such things.

Of the three images released by the authorities since July 7th 2005, none of them offer any sort of proof that all, or indeed any of the alleged perpetrators, were in London at the time of the attacks. The images, as released to the general public by the authorities, would be inadmissible as evidence in a court of law and could not be used to secure a successful prosecution against anyone. This proves that the four suspected bombers were not on the tube-trains that blew up.

Bombs Were UNDER the Train-Eyewitnesses

Tube survivor Bruce Lait “The policeman said ‘mind that hole, that’s where the bomb was’. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don’t remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag,” he said.

Witnesses of the tube-train explosions state that there were no Muslims with backpacks, and no backpacks or bags, left unattended on the trains, in the carriages that blew up, and that the floors of the trains blew upwards from underneath, not downwards, as would be the case with explosives inside the trains. Another report has Emma describing how “the vent under her feet exploded and flames shot up through the hole. Similar multiple explosions were seen & heard by witnesses just like the explosions in the 9/11 attacks.

Explosives used in bombs ‘were of military origin’ 

Christophe Chaboud, head of the French Anti-Terrorism Co-ordination Unit, told Le Monde newspaper that the explosives used in the bombings were of “military origin”, which he described as “very worrying”. At 11am on July 8th, the Metropolitan Police stated that: ‘there is no evidence to suggest that the attacks were the result of suicide bombings although this cannot be ruled out. ‘The simple fact is that there was a power surge,’

Bombers Documents ‘Found’

It is alleged that documents of the Muslim bombers were found. How is it that paper documents can survive bomb blasts that rip apart steel and people? Why were two of the men’s papers found in two or three different locations? Why would you give away your personal documents to a fellow bomber if you knew you were both going to die?

The Convenient Malfunction Of The London Bus Camera

But the investigation received a serious setback when it was discovered the CCTV cameras on the bus that blew up were not working so detectives will not get vital images of the bomber. This is classic and obvious op control. Turn off the cameras. Leave no visual evidence.

Bus route diverted

The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground, every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this bus was diverted. It now gets unbelievably weird, because the number 91 bus, that Hasib Hussain is reported to have taken from King’s Cross, along Euston Road to Euston Station to board the number 30 bus, that got diverted into Tavistock Square; actually goes to Tavistock Square.

So, if he wanted to get to Tavistock Square, he could just have stayed on the number 91 bus, and been sure of getting directly to Tavistock Square. The number 91 bus route goes from King’s Cross to Tavistock Square. That is conclusive proof that that particular number 30 bus, was part of the mock-terrorist drill, pre-rigged with explosives, like the three tube-trains, and was pre-planned to be diverted into, and blown up in, Tavistock Square, rather than blown up by a backpack bomb.

Bus 30 Pre-rigged with Explosives

The most likely case is that the number 30 bus had been pre-rigged with explosives during its previous service, when the CCTV cameras were disabled. The CCTV systems on Stagecoach buses are normally either the Israeli company Verint Systems RP12001, or Timespace X.200. A witness, Richmal Marie Oates-Whitehead, aged 35, who worked at the BMA in Tavistock Square, and was hailed as a heroine for her actions during the London bombings, said she heard two explosions on the bus. The controlled media immediately went on the offensive, and did a character assassination of the heroine, because her testimony did not fit with the official story, and she died unexpectedly, shortly afterwards.

Richard Jones

A passenger on the bus, Richard Jones, described how an ‘agitated young man’ rummaging in a small bag had made him decide to leave the bus between stops, just before the bus exploded. However, it is clear that the man Richard Jones saw could not possibly have been Hasib Hussain, not just because Richard Jones says he was on the bottom deck of the bus whereas the bomb was at the back of the upper deck, but because the description he gave of the young man that he saw does not match the physical description of Hasib as given by the police and shown in the CCTV pictures which were released.

Another oddity is that Hasib was identified due to the apparently unique injuries sustained by suicide bombers due to the explosives they strap on to their bodies. It is perhaps strange that he would have been identified by these unique injuries caused by strap on explosives when it was stated that he was carrying his bomb in a rucksack. It means this man Richard Jones was planted by the crooks as a false witness!

Suspicious Killing of Brazilian Citizen Jean-Charles de Menezes 

Oxford Law Prof alarmed at “police’s Mossad-style execution” of innocent ‘suspect’ Remember that the first story to emerge about the trains was an electrical power-surge having been the cause, and Jean Charles De Menezes was an electrician. Where did he work? Did he see the bombs being fitted under the train carriage floors? The carriage floor blew upwards, not downwards, indicating that the bombs were fitted under the carriage floors whilst in the garage.

He was not wearing suicide jacket, not running, not warned, did not know why they wanted to kill him. Police shot the electrician seven times in the head and once in the shoulder at point-blank range. Shot over 11 times making sure he was dead. Members of the Brazilian delegation that has wound up it’s flying investigative visit, revealed that some of the CCTV camera Blair himself “tried to halt an independent inquiry into the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes just hours after the innocent Brazilian’s death”.

Did De Menezes know or see something he was not supposed to? On 7/7 there was contradiction between the statements of the Transport Police, Metronet and the National Grid. The former two declared there WAS a power surge which “caused the explosions”. The latter – the National Grid, DENIED there was ever a power surge. Menezes was a contract electrician. Could he have been involved in some sort of work on the London underground?

London Bombing: Ex-Mossad Chief Reveals Too Much?

How did ex-Mossad chief Efraim Halevy know that the London bombings were “multiple, simultaneous explosions” when he wrote his warmonger screed for the Jerusalem Post on July 7 — the very same day of the London Bombing? “There was careful planning, intelligence gathering, and a sophisticated choice of timing as well as near-perfect execution.

Former MI5 Agent Says Bombings Look Like Inside Job 

A former British intelligence agent, jailed in 2002 for linking the British government with paying an Islamic militant group $160,000 in a failed assassination attempt on Colonel Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi of Libya, said this week the recent London bombings have all the earmarks of an inside job just like 9/11.

“It’s amazing how many aspects of the two events are so similar,” said David Shayler, the former MI5 agent and whistle blower, in a telephone conversation this week from his home in East Bonn on the southern coast of England. Further, he also received information that one of the named suicide bombers, whose picture was released in the London press, has turned up alive and well in Pakistan.

No One Claimed Responsibility

It is also interesting to note that no-one has ever claimed responsibility for the 7/7/2005 bombings, except for a message on a fake Al Qaida website on the same day, which was traced to Texas in the USA.

Denial of Public Inquiry

Survivors and relatives of victims of the 7 July attacks have been repeatedly denied an impartial public inquiry

Conclusion: Aim of Inside Job fulfilled

The final nail in the coffin of 7/7 being an inside job is the fulfillment of its objectives: staying the course in the war on terror, extra agency funding, and extra powers to strip more freedoms and liberties. But the main purpose was to continue to ignite flames of the self-imposed ‘war on terror’ that they themselves started after the 9/11 inside job. The flames were dying out and they had to keep the fire running.

This is why I keep on stressing on exposing the 9/11, 7/7 and other false flag operations, which form the basis of useless ‘War on Terror’ against Muslims and Islam, which has led to one war after another. It has lead to destruction of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Tunisia, Syria, Pakistan etc. It has lead to formation of Al-Qaida, Taliban, FSA, Boko Haram etc and now the monster of them all, ISIS. All of these dirty terror organizations were formed, financed and are under the control & command of the very perpetrators of these false flags (CIA, MOSSAD, Zionists).

Secondly we have to absolve the Muslims of Britain of the guilt of people among them having committed this horrendous crime. Life for British Muslims since 7/7 – abuse, suspicion and constant apologies | Mehdi Hasan

And thirdly so that we should all be forewarned and ready to recognize the next major false flag operation like 9/11 and 7/7 that may bring about Malhama or Armageddon or 3rd World War, which may be brought about by a false flag nuclear attack on USA or a NATO ally and which is probably coming sooner than later:

5 thoughts on “7/7 London Bombings Were an Inside Job

  1. A compelling argument for a cause that many have now, unfortunately, forgotten. After having followed trails of evidence and numerous essays and articles like this I am still convinced that both the World Trade Centre and the London underground attacks were false flag operations, but with time, and the disastrous pandemic of the last couple of years, the general interest seems to have faded. More’s the pity, as there are still some of us out here who are after the truth.

    Keep at it, you’re not alone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *